build all the software packages from code when it installed. I think there was a noticeable performance advantage doing that, but it was a fairly small advtangage, and IMO not raelly worth waiting so long for packages to build.
HAHAHAHAHA! I'm just here to help, brother. ;)
As much as I wouldn't want to add more to your plate, you would
probably enjoy Slackware or FreeBSD, too, given your description
Glad you ended up liking it, though!
As much as I wouldn't want to add more to your plate, you would
probably enjoy Slackware or FreeBSD, too, given your description
I've run them both. Since I do enjoy the odd game and I don't have
time to play for 6 hours before it launches I think I'll stick with
this setup. ;)
Honestly me too. It's the right amount of work for me, can tinker
or not depending on mood.
While I'm not sure about Slackware (I would assume so), FreeBSD has a binary package management system now, too. I gave it a try in a VM and
was able to get things going just as quickly as Arch, up to and
including a full desktop environment.
I'm just so used to Arch by now, that while I don't mind tinkering
with other stuff, I always delete it and go back to my go-to. ;)
I still tinker. But yeah arch just works, I cheat and use the install program now as well.... I'm lazy.
I must admit, the work they've done on that installer is outstanding.
Since I've already installed many times via the original way, I don't
need to learn any more. That script is the beez knees! :D
I still tinker. But yeah arch just
works, I cheat and use the install
program now as well.... I'm lazy.
| Sysop: | smooth0401 |
|---|---|
| Location: | New Providence, NJ |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 493956:51:07 |
| Calls: | 358 |
| Files: | 746 |
| D/L today: |
172 files (28,088K bytes) |
| Messages: | 59,205 |