RickV wrote to All <=-
Hello All.
2 questions. How can you tell why a packet went bad? How can I re-toss
a bad packet?
2 questions. How can you tell why a packet went bad? How can I re-toss a bad packet?
--- SBBSecho 3.24-Win32
RickV wrote to All <=-
Hello All.
2 questions. How can you tell why a packet went bad? How can I
re-toss a bad packet?
As is usual with Synchronet, the answers are likely on the Wiki, as I believe has been suggested to you quite a few times already...
I searched "bad packet" on the Wiki, and found this:
https://wiki.synchro.net/ref:fidonet_glossary?s[]=bad&s[]=packet
Looks pretty straightforward, eh?
You'd likely get more/quicker answers by asking in the appropriate
echo areas on DoveNet, since it's pretty much SBBS-specific.
... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
RickV wrote to Gamgee <=-
2 questions. How can you tell why a packet went bad? How can I
re-toss a bad packet?
I searched "bad packet" on the Wiki, and found this:
https://wiki.synchro.net/ref:fidonet_glossary?s[]=bad&s[]=packet
You'd likely get more/quicker answers by asking in the appropriate
echo areas on DoveNet, since it's pretty much SBBS-specific.
I posted the question in a Mystic support echo because that's where the bad packets are. On my Mystic system, my SBBS system is fine. You
should make sure YOU know what your talking about.
--- SBBSecho 3.24-Win32
* Origin: The File Cabinet BBS [filecabi.casacam.net:1025] (21:1/206)
Yep, OK... but sure looks like you're posting from SBBS... ^^^
Rick V wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Bad packets
By: Gamgee to RickV on Sun Mar 30 2025 12:37:36
Yep, OK... but sure looks like you're posting from SBBS... ^^^
Well I was, but the question was in a Mystic echo about a Mystic packet problem.
2 questions. How can you tell why a packet went bad? How can I re-toss a bad packet?
Rick V wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Bad packets
By: Gamgee to RickV on Sun Mar 30 2025 12:37:36
Yep, OK... but sure looks like you're posting from SBBS... ^^^
Well I was, but the question was in a Mystic echo about a Mystic
packet problem.
To be fair, you NEVER said a single word about it being a "Mystic"
packet problem.
In fact, just a few days ago, you were asking this EXACT same question
in the SBBS support forums on DoveNet, and specifically told
Digitalman "that helps" when he explained in good detail how to troubleshoot this problem on SBBS. Let me know if you'd like me to
quote some messages from there.
So............. can you see why I was thinking you were asking about Synchronet?
As a general rule, asking good/detailed/complete questions about
something will get you good answers. Being vague and leaving out
helpful information ... will not.
... Internal Error: The system has been taken over by sheep at line
19960
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
Rick V wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: Bad packets
By: Gamgee to RickV on Sun Mar 30 2025 12:37:36
Yep, OK... but sure looks like you're posting from SBBS... ^^^
Well I was, but the question was in a Mystic echo about a Mystic
packet problem.
To be fair, you NEVER said a single word about it being a "Mystic"
packet problem.
In fact, just a few days ago, you were asking this EXACT same question
in the SBBS support forums on DoveNet, and specifically told
Digitalman "that helps" when he explained in good detail how to troubleshoot this problem on SBBS. Let me know if you'd like me to
quote some messages from there.
So............. can you see why I was thinking you were asking about Synchronet?
As a general rule, asking good/detailed/complete questions about
something will get you good answers. Being vague and leaving out
helpful information ... will not.
... Internal Error: The system has been taken over by sheep at line
19960
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
Sysop: | smooth0401 |
---|---|
Location: | New Providence, NJ |
Users: | 4 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 65:07:35 |
Calls: | 289 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 469 |
Messages: | 46,975 |