Hollywood is betting big on AI movies just as audiences turn against them

Date:
Thu, 01 Oct 2026 11:23:23 +0000

Description:
Hollywood is taking AI films seriously, and even Tom Cruise things they are coming, but AI seems to be turning the audience off.

FULL STORY ======================================================================Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter If you ever need a sign that AI is coming for Hollywood then it must be that Jeffrey Katzenberg , the veteran Hollywood executive who co-founded Dreamworks, has just announced that hes launching an AI-focused studio.

Crucially, he told The Wrap that AI output was slop until very recently, but that in the last couple of months something has changed. Now he wants to make feature films and TV with AI, arguing that falling production costs will mean more films and new forms of storytelling. At the same time The Gifted , an AI-generated trailer, has just won a competition that puts $2.5m towards turning it into a proper feature film. Future Vision XPRIZE is one of the world's largest film competitions for hopeful and optimistic science fiction filmmaking that answers the question: what does a future worth building actually look like? Latest Videos From TechRadar Watch full video here:

You can watch the trailer for The Gifted here . The Gifted. #FutureVisionXPRIZE - YouTube Watch On Unfortunately, the industry focus on
AI seems to be happening at exactly the same time that the audience is being turned off by it. You may like Quote of the day by filmmaker James Cameron on AI: 'All of human art and human experience put into a blender' The more
famous people tell me to use AI, the less I want to Quote of the day by Tom Hanks on AI in cinema: "Without a doubt, people will be able to tell. But the question is, will they care?"

Filmustage , a movie production planning platform, analyzed Google Trends data and found searches rising on both sides of the AI debate. It found that the phrase movies with no AI was up 345% in the past month, while movies made with AI was up 112% in the same period.

Google Trends percentage increases can often be massive, so we shouldn't read too much into the numbers themselves, but the overall trend is upwards. The motivations behind those searches may be very different, but both suggest audiences increasingly want to know one thing before they watch: was AI involved? Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more. Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

I don't think it's hard to understand why. You only have to look at an AI
film to understand why people have reservations.

You can judge the trailer for The Gifted yourself, but while it may be a stunning technical achievement that AI has made this three-minute video, if
Im judging it as a movie trailer then I dont want to watch the movie.

The flaws are obvious. AI is clearly very good at spectacle: lightning, explosions, collapsing buildings and impossible camera angles. Not to mention lead characters who look almost like famous actors you know, but not quite. (Is that Amy Adams in The Gifted 's poster? No, it's not quite Amy Adams.) What to read next George Clooney raises the alarm over AI, while Maggie Gyllenhaal says it doesn't work for filmmaking Roku's new AI channel is top
of the slops: is this an important AI milestone? From event posters to cafe menus, AI slop is everywhere in the real world

The harder test is whether it can sustain believable characters, performances and emotional continuity for two hours rather than three minutes. If it does, then it's going to need much better dialogue than what's presented here.

I remember watching the pure-AI film Hell Grind in a theater recently, and that just about kept my attention for its 90-minute duration, but I was ready for it to be over by the end. It also played to AIs strengths, by not trying to make its world look real. It's when AI pretends to be real life that I think it falls down the most. Pure AI films... still look like AI Tom Cruise thinks people want to see real things, even in the age of AI. (Image credit: Getty Images / FilmMagic) Actors, perhaps seeing a future in which their skills are not as widely appreciated, are famously against AI , but even they seem to have accepted the overall trend towards it now.

As Deadline reports , Tom Cruise earned spontaneous applause for a six minute speech during a recent BAFTA Life in Pictures conversation in London. Cruise talked about how AI is coming, but people want to see real things.

There is nothing like human said Cruise, citing a summer of blockbuster films as proof that people want human experience. From what I've seen of AI movies, I'd say Cruise is exactly right. AI still can't produce an experience that looks human and the connection to the audience that goes along with that. But with even Tom Cruise acknowledging that AI is coming, and executives like Katzenberg jumping on board, AI movies seem almost inevitable now, especially with the saving in production costs that they bring with them.

But while AI might be economical, it definitely has its problems, and if people are already searching for movies with no AI then Hollywood has a branding problem before the AI movie era has even properly begun. AI as another tool for filmmakers The upcoming movie Corts from Utopai Studios. Set in 1519, the historical epic follows Hernn Corts during the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire. (Image credit: Utopai Studios) But perhaps before we assume that AI in films means the end to human actors and an influx of AI slop, lets talk to one of the AI studios making waves at the moment, Utopai Studios , who creates original films and television series using their own proprietary PAI software.

I talked to Kevin Chong, Chief Commercial Officer at Utopai Studios.

We dont think of AI films as a separate genre, explains Chong. AI is another tool filmmakers can use to tell stories, just as visual effects, digital cinematography and virtual production became part of the filmmaking process. It can help filmmakers create worlds, achieve a level of scale that might otherwise be difficult or prohibitively expensive, and give creators more choices.

And what about the end of human actors? At Utopai Studios, we dont see AI as
a replacement for human actors, and that isnt the future were building
toward, Chong explains. There may be stories where a completely synthetic character makes sense creatively, just as animation has always created characters that dont physically exist. But that is very different from saying audiences are going to stop wanting human performances.

Performance is one of the most human parts of filmmaking, Chong continues. Actors bring interpretation, emotion, instinct and life experience to a character in ways that are fundamental to storytelling. AI can become another part of the filmmaking toolkit including helping extend performances, create environments or enable things that would be difficult to achieve
traditionally but the creative decisions still need to come from people.

Tom Cruise is right: there is nothing quite like human, but perhaps there
will be a way for humans and AI to coexist in the future of movies after all. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.



======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/there-is-nothing-like-human- hollywood-is-betting-big-on-ai-movies-just-as-audiences-are-turning-against-th em-and-looking-for-films-made-by-real-people


--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 (Linux/64)
* Origin: tqwNet Technology News (1337:1/100)